Trademark documents and electronic signatures – an update

Par Laura Morrish,

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed new challenges to companies and their legal advisers, including that of obtaining the necessary signatures for the execution of documents. In response, the Law Commission has issue an updated guidance note, as Laura Morrish explains.

As we covered previously, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the ways in which trademark professionals manage routine tasks. While technology has enabled us to rapidly transition to working from home, obtaining necessary signatures requires even more advance planning at this time of social distancing.

As predicted in that earlier article, the UK’s lockdown, added to the already increasing demand for flexibility in respect of witness documents, has acted as a catalyst for the Law Commission to push forward its work on reform in this area. On 18 June 2020, it updated its guidance note in relation to the virtual execution of documents and the use of e-signatures to include tips on how to operate in practice in the current, challenging circumstances.

Law Commission best practice tips and advice

Its tips are as follows:

  • 1. Follow the Law Commission’s best practice notes for executing documents by virtual means and executing documents using electronic signatures;
  • 2. Agree: All parties should agree on how best to manage the transaction;
  • 3. Verify: Consider what steps (if any) should be taken to verify the identity and authority of each person signing beyond that which is required by law, including the anti-money laundering regime;
  • 4. Evidence: Ensure any evidence required for verification is easily accessible;
  • 5. Report: Notify all parties when the transaction has been closed; and
  • 6. Understand: Make sure that you’re aware of the legislative, regulatory or cultural requirements for virtual execution and e-signatures in the relevant legal area.

What does this mean for trademark owners?

Current circumstances have made the execution of documents more difficult of course; however, with the right preparation and forethought, it is possible to meet deadline and formality requirements. In line with the above guidance, we advise:

  1. Prepare for the execution of documents as early as possible, in order to agree a method of signature that is acceptable to all parties and still legally binding in the relevant jurisdictions.
  2. Prepare images of signatures and/or electronic signatures and arrange for documents to be scanned or printed so that signatories can easily access them.
  3. Consider arranging for original documents to be posted between the parties for physical signature, where electronic signatures are not accepted (e.g. outside the UK and EU).
  4. Check in advance if witnessing is required and, if so, what form of witnessing would be acceptable in order to meet local requirements.
  5. Allow sufficient time to have any documents notarised and where legalisation is required, make third parties aware of the limited service being offered in the UK.

For further guidance on managing signatures, witnesses, notarisation and legalisation, please speak to your Novagraaf attorney or contact us below.

Laura Morrish is a Chartered Trademark Attorney at Novagraaf in the UK. 

Insights liés

Articles

Évolution récentes autour de l’enveloppe Soleau

Cet article aborde l'évolution de l'enveloppe Soleau, un moyen de certifier la date de possession d'une invention. Depuis avril 2024, les dépôts papier ne sont plus acceptés, seuls les dépôts en ligne sont autorisés via le site de l'INPI. Nous précisons ici les modalités de dépôt, de conservation et de restitution de l'enveloppe, soulignant son rôle de preuve de possession antérieure, mais pas de propriété intellectuelle.

Par Adrien Metivet,
Évolution récentes autour de l’enveloppe Soleau
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Bilan de la procédure d’opposition à un brevet devant l’INPI

La mise en place de la loi PACTE il y a quatre ans a instauré une nouvelle procédure d'opposition des brevets devant l'INPI, marquant ainsi une évolution significative dans le paysage de la propriété industrielle en France. Récemment, l'INPI a publié un bilan détaillant les premières années de cette procédure, fournissant ainsi un aperçu des tendances et des résultats obtenus depuis son entrée en vigueur. Lire la suite

Par Rose-Marie Ehanno,
[Blog] Bilan de la procédure d’opposition à un brevet devant l’INPI
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Rétrospective sur l’impact de la pandémie du COVID-19 pour les contrefacteurs

L’Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (OCDE) et l’Office de l'Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO) ont réalisé une étude conjointe sur le « Commerce illicite de contrefaçons dans le contexte de la COVID-19 ». Cette étude met notamment en lumière les facteurs qui ont favorisé la diffusion de produits contrefaisants. Lire la suite

Par Matthieu Boulard,
[Blog] Rétrospective sur l’impact de la pandémie du COVID-19 pour les contrefacteurs

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous