Dog eat dog in dispute over band name

Surrealist 60s British music group ‘The Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band' is fighting to protect its name and logo after they were registered as a trademark by a third-party media company. Theo Visser explains why a case like this is often more complicated than it appears.

‘The Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band’, so christened after the 1920s cartoon dog ‘Bonzo’, was formed by a group of London arts students in the early 1960s. The band released its debut album ‘Gorilla’ in 1967 before coming to prominence in 1968 on the TV comedy show Do Not Adjust Your Set. The surrealist group also performed in the Beatles’ film Magical Mystery Tour (1967).

Although the band was dissolved in 1970, the group was reformed by several members of the original line-up in 2006 for a concert in London and UK tour.Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band The band now finds itself steeped in a trademark dispute after British media company, Anglo Atlantic Media Ltd, obtained a figurative trademark registration for the band’s name and logo in 2016 (pictured right). 

That application was made without the consent of the remaining band members, who say they only found out when they attempted to register the trademark themselves in 2017. Anglo Atlantic Media opposed that trademark application, as well as the band’s subsequent argument that it held prior rights to the name, arguing that the name had not been in use for years before its own 2016 trademark application. 

Complicating factors

In theory, such a case may seem simple to resolve due to the history of the band. In reality, however, such disputes can become quite complicated due to the passage of time, as well as associated IP issues; for example, whether there is copyright on the logo and, if so, who it belongs to. Attributing ownership of IP rights is also further problematic in this instance due to the changes to the line-up of the group over the years. 

While musicians have become more astute in recent years about the importance of establishing band partnership agreements to address potentially contentious issues, such as shares in royalty payments, this was not always the case. In addition, one issue that frequently gets overlooked is the question of who owns the band’s name, with the history of rock and roll littered with acrimonious, costly and often embarrassing disputed between former friends and bandmates over the right to use the name of a disbanded musical group. In this instance, that challenge is further complicated by a trademark registration by a third party. 

In due course, the UKIPO will examine the evidence supplied and make a decision over who has the right or not to register the band’s name and logo as a trademark. In the meantime, any budding musicians are advised to draft a partnership agreement with their bandmates that clearly states who owns the rights to their band name or logo, and what will happen to them should the original line-up go their separate ways and/or new members join. 

Theo Visser is an IP consultant in the Amsterdam offices of Novagraaf.

Insights liés

Nova IP Hour

Consultation des utilisateurs sur l’utilisation de la visioconférence

Depuis le 1er avril 2020, l'utilisation de la visioconférence pour la tenue de procédures orales devant les chambres de recours est possible. Une consultation des utilisateurs est actuellement menée afin d’évaluer la mise en œuvre technique des procédures orales tenues par visioconférence devant les chambres de recours. Si vous souhaitez participer, la consultation en ligne est ouverte jusqu’au 31 mars 2023. Lire la suite

Par Matthieu Boulard,
Consultation des utilisateurs sur l’utilisation de la visioconférence
Nova IP Hour

Décision de la Cour Constitutionnelle allemande

La Cour Constitutionnelle allemande vient de décider de l’inadmissibilité d’un ensemble de recours relatifs des décisions des Chambres de Recours et de la Grande Chambre de Recours de l’OEB avec la constitution allemande (‘Grundgesetz’). Ces recours avaient été formulés par diverses entités, établies tant en Allemagne et dans des pays de l’UE que dans des pays hors UE. Pour ce qui est des parties établies hors UE, elles ne peuvent se prévaloir des droits fondamentaux de la constitution allemande. Lire la suite

Par Martin Kohrs,
Décision de la Cour Constitutionnelle allemande

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous

Confidentialité et cookies

Pour fournir la meilleure expérience possible aux visiteurs du site Web, Novagraaf utilise des cookies. En cliquant sur "Accepter" ou en continuant d’utiliser le site, vous acceptez notre politique de confidentialité, y compris la politique en matière de cookies.