Dairy alternatives: can you call a product 'cheese' if it's vegan?

The UK’s dairy industry has objected to the use of the word ‘cheese’ by Vegan cheesemonger La Fauxmagerie, which opened in London last month, citing EU rules requiring products marketed as ‘milk’, ‘cheese’ and ‘butter’ to include dairy.  

Dairy UK has requested that the La Fauxmagerie stop calling its Vegan products ‘cheese’, which it believes is confusing consumers, explaining: "It concerns us that consumers are being misled with the use of dairy terms like cheese by the plant-based sector. It is fundamental to protect the consumer from product descriptions which are misleading.”

Back in 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) ruled that dairy-alternative products cannot be sold in the EU under names such as ‘milk’, ‘butter’ or ‘cheese’. The decision followed a referral from the German courts, which was requesting clarity as to the interpretation of the Agricultural Product Standards Regulations (APS Regulations) in light of a dispute involving German vegan and vegetarian food company Tofu Town.

The central question was whether ‘is it possible to use regulated product names for new product types?’, to which the CJEU responded that (bar some listed exceptions) it was not: “Purely plant-based products cannot, in principle, be marketed with designations such as ‘milk’, ‘cream’, ‘butter’, ‘cheese’ or ‘yoghurt’, which are reserved by EU law for animal products.The same is true if those designations are accompanied by clarifying or descriptive terms indicating the plant origin of the product concerned.”

Likelihood of confusion?

The CJEU ruling is not the only limitation on plant-alternative names. In 2017, France passed an amendment to its agricultural bill that bans companies from using meat-related words to describe vegan dishes such as ‘vegan shawarma kebab’, ‘vegetable steak’ and ‘soy sausage’. The French amendment was initiated by a cattle farmer, and a number of other meat producers have reportedly requested similar provisions in other territories.

However, critics of the amendment and the CJEU ruling argue that the decision is less about avoiding customer confusion than it is about ‘catering to the dairy industry’. The plant-based sector is booming, as consumers increasingly turn to dairy and meat alternatives, with recent market forecasts suggesting growth of 8.4% between 2015 and 2020.

What all this means for the future of La Fauxmagerie’s products is not yet known. At present, the shop is refusing to back down and change its product names, although any action brought under the APS Regulations may well have some impact on that decision. There is no doubt the company is popular, despite only recently opening – it has more than 8,000 followers on Instagram. This may ‘grate’ on some and we will be ‘caerphilly’ watching to see what happens next.

Insights liés

Articles

Oncologie : l'Europe excelle en stratups mais peine à s'imposer dans l'innovation de pointe

L'Office européen des brevets (OEB) a publié le mois dernier sa deuxième étude en matière d’innovation dans les technologies anticancéreuses. Selon cette étude, l'Europe est en tête en nombre de startups dédiées à l'oncologie mais recule face aux États-Unis et à la Chine dans les domaines technologiques les plus innovants contre le cancer, notamment en immunothérapie cellulaire, thérapie génique et analyse d’images. Par ailleurs, la recherche publique joue un rôle central dans l’innovation oncologique européenne, la France se distinguant particulièrement avec l’INSERM et le CNRS, classés deuxième et troisième mondialement pour les dépôts de brevets liés au cancer.

Par Nadège Lagneau,
Oncologie : l'Europe excelle en stratups mais peine à s'imposer dans l'innovation de pointe
Articles

L’appréciation de la nature et de l'importance de l'usage en matière de déchéance de marque pour défaut d'exploitation

Les titulaires de marques françaises ou de l'Union européenne sont tenus d'utiliser leur marque dans les cinq ans suivant son enregistrement, sous peine de déchéance en cas d'action intentée par un tiers. L'arrêt du Tribunal de l'Union européenne du 5 mars 2025 (aff. T-118/24), concernant la marque de l'UE "ROZALIYA jewelry for enlightenment", rappelle des principes essentiels relatifs à la nature et à l'importance de l'usage d'une marque.

Par Perrine Waendendries,
L’appréciation de la nature et de l'importance de l'usage en matière de déchéance de marque pour défaut d'exploitation

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous