UK ratifies Unified Patent Court agreement

Par Robert Balsters,

The UK’s Minister for Intellectual Property, Sam Gyimah MP, confirmed on 26 April that the UK has ratified the Unified Patent Court (UPC) agreement. This represents a key milestone in the implementation of the Unitary Patent, as the UK is one of three mandatory signatories required for the agreement to come into force. Of the other two, France, has already ratified; however, Germany, is yet to do so, as a result of a case currently pending in its Federal Constitutional Court.

A total of 16 countries have now ratified the agreement, namely: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, the UK and France (one of the three mandatory ratifying countries).

The UK’s ratification follows an announcement by the government in 2016 that it planned to ratify the agreement and to set up a divisional court in London despite fears Brexit would halt negotiations.

Nonetheless, constitutional challenges to the UPC agreement at Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court have also delayed the timeframe with an official communication in December 2017 stating that it “is now difficult to predict any timeline”.

What is likely to happen?

The Constitutional Court invited German public institutions for comments on the challenge up until late December 2017. As things stand, there are now two potential scenarios and consequences for the UPC:

  1. 1) The Constitutional Court can decide not to accept the challenge, e.g. because they see no prospects of success: then the way would be free for the German government to finalise the ratification procedure thus allowing the UPC to start before the summer of 2018, or
  2. 2) The Constitutional Court decides to hear the complaint. This will likely take quite some time, meaning it may be months or years before a final decision is made. The Court may indicate whether Germany in the meantime could or could not ratify. Clearly, in this scenario, there could be a substantial delay for the UPC to start.

What should businesses do?

Although the timing for the implementation of the court system continues to slip, the implications of the Unitary Patent right and associated patent court system is rightly on the minds of IP counsel throughout Europe and beyond.

With a marketplace of more than 500 million consumers, Europe is a major economic power, and one of the world’s largest importers and exporters of goods and services. Business owners know that if they are to trade successfully in Europe, they first need to ensure they’ve appropriately protected their IP rights in the territory. However, with 28 member states to cover, along with a number of important surrounding countries such as Switzerland, this has the potential to be an expensive exercise.

Once implemented, the new pan-European Unitary Patent right should provide businesses from within and outside the EU with an important new tool to protect their innovations throughout the participating member states and to enhance their success in what is already a highly competitive and inventive marketplace.

You can find out more about the Unitary Patent in our frequently asked questions.

Robert Balsters is a Patent Attorney at Novagraaf in Geneva

Insights liés

Blog Nova IP Hour

Réductions de taxes pour les petites et micro-entités : un nouveau guide à l’OEB

Au 1er avril 2024, de nombreuses taxes ont été modifiées à l’OEB. A cette occasion, un guide dédié aux petites entités et micro-entités a été établit sous la forme d’une foire aux questions (FAQ). L’une des nouvelles mesures concerne les entités innovantes nécessitant un soutien financier, qui peuvent bénéficier d’une réduction de taxes de 30% (sous conditions). Lire la suite

Par Rose-Marie Ehanno,
Réductions de taxes pour les petites et micro-entités : un nouveau guide à l’OEB
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Dessins et Modèles : dommage collatéral de l’influence, ou comment Rihanna détruit le caractère individuel d’un modèle de basket PUMA

Le 6 mars 2024, le Tribunal de l’UE a confirmé la nullité prononcée par l’EUIPO concernant un modèle de basket PUMA. La raison ? Rihanna, anciennement directrice artistique de la marque, s’était affichée en 2014 sur son compte Instagram et son site internet portant le modèle en question, soit bien avant son dépôt auprès de l’office en 2016. Lire la suite

Par Novagraaf Team,
[Blog] Dessins et Modèles : dommage collatéral de l’influence, ou comment Rihanna détruit le caractère individuel d’un modèle de basket PUMA
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Accélération de la procédure d'opposition en cas d'action parallèle

L'OEB a récemment précisé que la procédure d'opposition serait accélérée si elle est informée par une juridiction nationale ou une administration compétente d'un État contractant qu'une action en contrefaçon ou en nullité concernant le brevet en question a été engagée. Cette mesure vise à favoriser la sécurité juridique, l'économie de la procédure, ainsi que la qualité et la cohérence du système du brevet européen, conformément au communiqué du 7 novembre 2023. Lire la suite

Par Matthieu Boulard,
[Blog] Accélération de la procédure d'opposition en cas d'action parallèle

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous